4:10 a.m.
I just committed the changes to the 'generic' XEmacs files, so that we can
test whether there will be any badness if people build --with-gtk=no (the
default).
There seems to be a CVS lock right now, and I forgot to check in the
configure script, but you can regenerate it with 'autoconf' without a
problem.
I am going to try and update my ancient 21.2 port to the current stuff
sometime tomorrow. I don't think it will be 'runnable', but the code would
at least be there.
Here's the message from CVS if any intrepid CVS admins want to fix it. :)
cvs server: [20:05:18] waiting for martinb's lock in /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs
I hope to have this done in the next few days while the wife is scuba
diving. And she thinks _she_ is the one who will be having a good time. :)
-Bill P.
7:28 a.m.
A patch to gtk-xemacs-21-2 only:
(I will not apply this patch - that is up to Bill)
Index: src/glyphs.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs/src/glyphs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23.2.93.2.1
diff -u -w -r1.23.2.93.2.1 glyphs.c
--- src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 03:59:59 1.23.2.93.2.1
+++ src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 07:27:20
＠＠ -46,7 +46,7 ＠＠
#include "specifier.h"
#include "window.h"
-#ifdef HAVE_XPM && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
+#if defined (HAVE_XPM) && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
#include <X11/xpm.h>
#endif
Oh, here's another patch for Bill:
Index: lib-src/config.values.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs/lib-src/config.values.in,v
retrieving revision 1.16.2.9
diff -u -w -r1.16.2.9 config.values.in
--- lib-src/config.values.in 2001/01/12 08:33:27 1.16.2.9
+++ lib-src/config.values.in 2001/02/01 07:27:11
＠＠ -31,6 +31,7 ＠＠
EXEC_PREFIX "＠EXEC_PREFIX＠"
EXEC_PREFIX_USER_DEFINED "＠EXEC_PREFIX_USER_DEFINED＠"
FFLAGS "＠FFLAGS＠"
+GTK_CONFIG "＠GTK_CONFIG＠"
INFODIR "＠INFODIR＠"
INFODIR_USER_DEFINED "＠INFODIR_USER_DEFINED＠"
INFOPATH "＠INFOPATH＠"
2:03 p.m.
Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
A patch to gtk-xemacs-21-2 only:
(I will not apply this patch - that is up to Bill)
Index: src/glyphs.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs/src/glyphs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23.2.93.2.1
diff -u -w -r1.23.2.93.2.1 glyphs.c
--- src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 03:59:59 1.23.2.93.2.1
+++ src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 07:27:20
＠＠ -46,7 +46,7 ＠＠
#include "specifier.h"
#include "window.h"
-#ifdef HAVE_XPM && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
+#if defined (HAVE_XPM) && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
#include <X11/xpm.h>
#endif
Thanks martin... I'm just very confused how the !＠#%!＠ this built on my
machine here. I did a full X build and it worked (lots of weird lisp
errors, but it built temacs & dumped xemacs enough to compile all the
lisp).
Oh, here's another patch for Bill:
I'll apply both of these right away. Thanks!
-bp
6:53 a.m.
>>>> "WMP" == William M Perry
<wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes:
WMP> Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Index: src/glyphs.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs/src/glyphs.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.23.2.93.2.1
> diff -u -w -r1.23.2.93.2.1 glyphs.c
> --- src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 03:59:59 1.23.2.93.2.1
> +++ src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 07:27:20
> ＠＠ -46,7 +46,7 ＠＠
> #include "specifier.h"
> #include "window.h"
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_XPM && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
> +#if defined (HAVE_XPM) && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
> #include <X11/xpm.h>
> #endif
WMP> Thanks martin... I'm just very confused how the !＠#%!＠ this built on my
WMP> machine here.
The above was merely a warning ... trailing garbage in directive...
Read your compiler warnings!
6:25 p.m.
Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>> "WMP" == William M Perry
<wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes:
WMP> Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>> Index: src/glyphs.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs/src/glyphs.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.23.2.93.2.1
>> diff -u -w -r1.23.2.93.2.1 glyphs.c
>> --- src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 03:59:59 1.23.2.93.2.1
>> +++ src/glyphs.c 2001/02/01 07:27:20
>> ＠＠ -46,7 +46,7 ＠＠
>> #include "specifier.h"
>> #include "window.h"
>>
>> -#ifdef HAVE_XPM && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
>> +#if defined (HAVE_XPM) && !defined (HAVE_GTK)
>> #include <X11/xpm.h>
>> #endif
WMP> Thanks martin... I'm just very confused how the !＠#%!＠ this built on my
WMP> machine here.
The above was merely a warning ... trailing garbage in directive...
Read your compiler warnings!
I need to make some changes to the default flags that have started being
used in 21.2 - the -Wmissing-prototypes and -Wshadow flags make the GTK
headers spew out approximately 1 googleplex[1] of warnings per file. *sigh*
I've removed those from my local workspace, and am scanning the warnings
here - already found a few nasty ones. The change in the GC stuff (no
markobj function passed now) royally ＠!#%!＠ed me in a few places where I
forgot to make the change. :)
-bp
[1] This is Liam's new favorite number, so we've been discussing it quite a
bit... Wheee! :)
7:31 a.m.
Executive summary: gtk-xemacs-21.2 is broken in at least two different
ways, even if --with-gtk is not used.
>>>> "Bill" == William M Perry
<wmperry(a)aventail.com> writes:
Bill> I just committed the changes to the 'generic' XEmacs files, so that we
can
Bill> test whether there will be any badness if people build --with-gtk=no (the
Bill> default).
Bill> There seems to be a CVS lock right now, and I forgot to check in the
Bill> configure script, but you can regenerate it with 'autoconf' without a
Bill> problem.
I built the gtk-xemacs-21.2 branch. It seemed to want to use gtk,
even though I didn't ask it to. Then it died as follows (on linux):
checking for specified window system
checking for GNOME configuration script... gnome-config
Defining HAVE_GNOME
Appending "-rdynamic -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnomeui -lart_lgpl -lgdk_imlib
-lSM -lICE -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lXext -lX11 -lgnome -lgnomesupport -lesd -laudiofile -lm
-ldb1 -lglib -ldl" to $libs_gtk
Appending "-I/usr/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include" to $c_switch_gtk
checking for GTK configuration script... gtk-config
checking gtk version... 1.2.6
checking gtk libs... Appending "-L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic
-lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXext -lX11 -lm" to $libs_gtk
-L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXext -lX11 -lm
checking gtk cflags... Appending "-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/lib/glib/include" to $c_switch_gtk
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include
checking for main in -lgdk_imlib... yes
Prepending "-lgdk_imlib" to $libs_gtk
checking for Imlib_init in -lImlib... yes
Appending "-lImlib" to $libs_gtk
checking for gdk_imlib_init... yes
Defining HAVE_GDK_IMLIB_INIT
Defining HAVE_XPM
Defining HAVE_GTK
xemacs will be linked with "console-gtk.o device-gtk.o event-gtk.o
frame-gtk.o"
xemacs will be linked with "objects-gtk.o redisplay-gtk.o glyphs-gtk.o"
xemacs will be linked with "select-gtk.o gccache-gtk.o"
xemacs will be linked with "gtk-xemacs.o ui-gtk.o"
checking for glade/glade.h... no
checking for glade.h... no
checking for main in -lxml... yes
Prepending "-lxml" to $libs_gtk
checking for main in -lglade... yes
Prepending "-lglade" to $libs_gtk
checking for main in -lglade-gnome... yes
Prepending "-lglade-gnome" to $libs_gtk
no
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: line 6196: syntax error near unexpected token `!'
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: line 6196: `! ! ! ! ! '
Command "/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure --extra-verbose --with-gnu-make
--package-path=~/.xemacs:/usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages:/usr/local/lib/xemacs/mule-packages
--with-widgets=no --site-prefixes=/local/xemacs/aux:/usr/local --compiler=gcc29
--error-checking=none --debug=no --memory-usage-stats=no --use-union-type=no --with-mule
--with-pop --with-dragndrop=no --use-minimal-tagbits=no
--use-indexed-lrecord-implementation=no --cflags=-fstrict-aliasing -O3 -pipe -Wall
-Winline -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-switch -Wno-sign-compare
-Wno-uninitialized -Wshadow --prefix=/local/xemacs/inst" failed: rc=2
On my Solaris system, there is no hint of gtk or gnome, so you'd think
everything would be hunky-dorey. In fact, configure is happy after
failing to find gtk:
checking for specified window system
checking for GNOME configuration script... /project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: gnome-config:
not found
no
checking for GTK configuration script... /project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: gtk12-config:
not found
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: gtk14-config: not found
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: gtk-config: not found
no
but compile fails as follows:
cc -c -fast -xO5 -Demacs -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/xemacs/aux/include
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/canna/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/openwin/include
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/src/events.c
"/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/src/events.c", line 33: cannot find include file:
"console-gtk.h"
cc: acomp failed for /project/xemacs/ws/gtk/src/events.c
make[1]: *** [events.o] Error 2
2:27 p.m.
Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Executive summary: gtk-xemacs-21.2 is broken in at least two
different
ways, even if --with-gtk is not used.
>>>>> "Bill" == William M Perry <wmperry(a)aventail.com>
writes:
Bill> I just committed the changes to the 'generic' XEmacs files, so that we
can
Bill> test whether there will be any badness if people build --with-gtk=no (the
Bill> default).
Bill> There seems to be a CVS lock right now, and I forgot to check in the
Bill> configure script, but you can regenerate it with 'autoconf' without a
Bill> problem.
I built the gtk-xemacs-21.2 branch. It seemed to want to use gtk,
even though I didn't ask it to. Then it died as follows (on linux):
checking for specified window system
checking for GNOME configuration script... gnome-config
Defining HAVE_GNOME
Appending "-rdynamic -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnomeui -lart_lgpl
-lgdk_imlib -lSM -lICE -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lXext -lX11 -lgnome -lgnomesupport -lesd
-laudiofile -lm -ldb1 -lglib -ldl" to $libs_gtk
Appending "-I/usr/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include" to $c_switch_gtk
checking for GTK configuration script... gtk-config
checking gtk version... 1.2.6
checking gtk libs... Appending "-L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk
-rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXext -lX11 -lm" to $libs_gtk
-L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXext -lX11 -lm
checking gtk cflags... Appending "-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/lib/glib/include" to $c_switch_gtk
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include
checking for main in -lgdk_imlib... yes
Prepending "-lgdk_imlib" to $libs_gtk
checking for Imlib_init in -lImlib... yes
Appending "-lImlib" to $libs_gtk
checking for gdk_imlib_init... yes
Defining HAVE_GDK_IMLIB_INIT
Defining HAVE_XPM
Defining HAVE_GTK
xemacs will be linked with "console-gtk.o device-gtk.o event-gtk.o
frame-gtk.o"
xemacs will be linked with "objects-gtk.o redisplay-gtk.o glyphs-gtk.o"
xemacs will be linked with "select-gtk.o gccache-gtk.o"
xemacs will be linked with "gtk-xemacs.o ui-gtk.o"
checking for glade/glade.h... no
checking for glade.h... no
checking for main in -lxml... yes
Prepending "-lxml" to $libs_gtk
checking for main in -lglade... yes
Prepending "-lglade" to $libs_gtk
checking for main in -lglade-gnome... yes
Prepending "-lglade-gnome" to $libs_gtk
no
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: line 6196: syntax error near unexpected token `!'
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: line 6196: `! ! ! ! ! '
Command "/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure --extra-verbose --with-gnu-make
--package-path=~/.xemacs:/usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages:/usr/local/lib/xemacs/mule-packages
--with-widgets=no --site-prefixes=/local/xemacs/aux:/usr/local --compiler=gcc29
--error-checking=none --debug=no --memory-usage-stats=no --use-union-type=no --with-mule
--with-pop --with-dragndrop=no --use-minimal-tagbits=no
--use-indexed-lrecord-implementation=no --cflags=-fstrict-aliasing -O3 -pipe -Wall
-Winline -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-switch -Wno-sign-compare
-Wno-uninitialized -Wshadow --prefix=/local/xemacs/inst" failed: rc=2
Grrr - stupid mistake on my part. Just committed changes to fix them. I
hand applied a patch or two to configure.in, and the `!' markers got left
in one chunk, and I forgot to put the 'if test "$with_gtk" !=
"no"' check
around some stuff. Now I have to figure out why it _didn't_ find gtk on my
box. Very weird.
On my Solaris system, there is no hint of gtk or gnome, so you'd
think
everything would be hunky-dorey. In fact, configure is happy after
failing to find gtk:
checking for specified window system
checking for GNOME configuration script... /project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure:
gnome-config: not found
no
checking for GTK configuration script... /project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: gtk12-config:
not found
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: gtk14-config: not found
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/configure: gtk-config: not found
no
but compile fails as follows:
cc -c -fast -xO5 -Demacs -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/xemacs/aux/include
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/canna/include -I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/openwin/include
/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/src/events.c
"/project/xemacs/ws/gtk/src/events.c", line 33: cannot find include file:
"console-gtk.h"
cc: acomp failed for /project/xemacs/ws/gtk/src/events.c
make[1]: *** [events.o] Error 2
I just checked in all the GTK code - I doubt any of it will compile, but
the header files will fulfill this. Sorry about that.
-Bill P.
3:02 p.m.
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:27:53 EST, William M. Perry said:
> checking for GNOME configuration script... gnome-config
> Defining HAVE_GNOME
> Appending "-rdynamic -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnomeui -lart_lgpl
-lgdk_imlib -lSM -lICE -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lXext -lX11 -lgnome -lgnomesupport -lesd
-laudiofile -lm -ldb1 -lglib -ldl" to $libs_gtk
> Appending "-I/usr/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H
-I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include" to
$c_switch_gtk
> checking for GTK configuration script... gtk-config
Two questions:
1) Is it intended that it will build right if GTK is there but Gnome isnt?
2) If Gnome *is* present, what additional features/etc, if any, does that
get you?
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
7:19 p.m.
Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu writes:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:27:53 EST, William M. Perry said:
> > checking for GNOME configuration script... gnome-config
> > Defining HAVE_GNOME
> > Appending "-rdynamic -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnomeui
-lart_lgpl -lgdk_imlib -lSM -lICE -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lXext -lX11
-lgnome -lgnomesupport -lesd -laudiofile -lm -ldb1 -lglib -ldl" to
$libs_gtk
> > Appending "-I/usr/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H
-I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/lib/glib/include" to $c_switch_gtk
> > checking for GTK configuration script... gtk-config
Two questions:
1) Is it intended that it will build right if GTK is there but Gnome
isnt?
Yes, it will.
2) If Gnome *is* present, what additional features/etc, if any, does
that
get you?
You will be able to use all the gnome widgets from lisp, you get GNOME
session management, and the main window of XEmacs is a GnomeApp, so you get
a detachable and dockable menubar (no toolbar yet, the way XEmacs handles
these is just a little too weird for that to work, but I've been trying to
find a hack around this since I got toolbars working).
It is fun working in a XEmacs with the menubar on the bottom of the
frame. :) Distracting, but fun.
You will still get a detachable menubar if you build without GNOME, but you
can just detach it, you cannot dock it at the bottom of the window.
-Bill P.
8694
days inactive
8695
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Martin Buchholz -
Valdis Kl=?iso8859-4?Q?=BA?=tnieks -
William M. Perry