>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes: > > > David C Worenklein <dcw(a)gcm.com&gt; writes: > >> zap-to-char was up-to-but-not-including in Emacs 18. It was fun > >> watching all my macros and functions break when RMS changed the > >> behavior. > > > Ha ha ha! Cool. What a moronic change. > > > (yes, zap-up-to-char is much more useful than zap-to-char.) > > Do you want to put it back on `M-z'? Now is definitely the time ...

>>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes: Hrvoje> SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: >> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes: >> >> > David C Worenklein <dcw(a)gcm.com&gt; writes: >> >> zap-to-char was up-to-but-not-including in Emacs 18. It was fun >> >> watching all my macros and functions break when RMS changed the >> >> behavior. >> >> > Ha ha ha! Cool. What a moronic change. >> >> > (yes, zap-up-to-char is much more useful than zap-to-char.) >> >> Do you want to put it back on `M-z'? Now is definitely the time ... Hrvoje> Not without a user poll. Speaking strictly as a user, I've only ever tried using `zap-to-char' a few times during my life with Emacs. On each occasion I was annoyed because I really wanted `zap-up-to-char'. The user interface for `zap-to-char' is really broken, and I would vote for a change to binding M-z to `zap-up-to-char', incompatible though it is. Martin