Hi Morgon,
Morgon Kanter <morgon(a)surgo.net> wrote:
Dear Bug Team!
The manual page for etags says that the option -m is available as a
synonym for the long option --members. This is not the case, however;
running etags, one can easily verify this:
$ etags -m
etags: invalid option -- m
Try `etags --help' for a complete list of options.
$ etags --members
etags: no input files specified.
Try `etags --help' for a complete list of options.
And when actually run on input files, etags --members will produce
real output and etags -m will produce the same invalid option
message.
I'm not sure if this is the fault of the man page or someone just not
remembering to add -m to the list of available options.
The Emacs etags man page also lists -m as a synonym for --members, but
their etags also fails to recognize it. That is because we both get our
etags from an upstream source. Would you please report this problem to
Francesco <pot(a)gnu.org>. I don't know how to type his surname on a TTY
(I'm remotely logged in from a place where a remote X connection would
be too painful), but you can find it in lib-src/etags.c.
Also, it would be nice if report-xemacs-bug could send mail with
smtpmail rather than the sendmail command, which I do not have.
Set or customize send-mail-function to 'smtpmail-send-it.
Regards,
--
Jerry James, Assistant Professor james(a)xemacs.org
Computer Science Department
http://www.cs.usu.edu/~jerry/
Utah State University