Re: xemacs source code HOWTO ?
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> wrote:
Stef Epardaud <stef(a)lunatech.com> writes:
> while, and Java brainwashed me quite well, i got very confused as to all
> the precompiler macros
Don't worry. The preprocessor macro's scare everybody. They are way
over the top, IMVHO.
Don't be so VH :-) There are far too many useless macros in XEmacs,
notably the ones for just getting a structure field that takes longer to type
than directly `foo->bar'. Not to speak about GCC_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX_SUCK (IIRC)
and other zawinskies of this sort :-)
I whish we rewritte XEmacs in C++ someday.
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / ENST, INFRES C201.1 mailto:vernaļ¼ inf.enst.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. +33 (1) 45 81 73 46
75013 Paris, France Fax. +33 (1) 45 81 31 19
Andy Piper
Monday, 16 August
Mon, 16 Aug
5:44 p.m.
New subject: xemacs source code HOWTO ?
At 04:49 PM 8/16/99 +0200, Didier Verna wrote:
Don't be so VH :-) There are far too many useless macros
in XEmacs,
notably the ones for just getting a structure field that takes longer to type
than directly `foo->bar'. Not to speak about
These are not useless. It means you can just change the header instead of
all of your source code if your definition of how to access bar changes.
Its just OO encapsulation/abstraction in C.
I whish we rewritte XEmacs in C++ someday.
I think it then might be Eighty Megs and Constantly Swapping instead of
Eighteen...
andy
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Andy Piper
Senior Consultant Architect, BEA Systems Ltd
Marcus Thiessel
Tuesday, 17 August
Tue, 17 Aug
9:19 a.m.
New subject: xemacs source code HOWTO ?
> I whish we rewritte XEmacs in C++ someday.
I think it then might be Eighty Megs and Constantly Swapping instead of
Eighteen...
Good reason to buy another half-a-gig of ram. ;-)
--Marcus
Kyle Jones
Monday, 16 August
Mon, 16 Aug
6:36 p.m.
New subject: xemacs source code HOWTO ?
Didier Verna writes:
Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> wrote:
> Stef Epardaud <stef(a)lunatech.com> writes:
>
> > while, and Java brainwashed me quite well, i got very confused as to all
> > the precompiler macros
>
> Don't worry. The preprocessor macro's scare everybody. They are way
> over the top, IMVHO.
Don't be so VH :-) There are far too many useless macros in XEmacs,
notably the ones for just getting a structure field that takes
longer to type than directly `foo->bar'. Not to speak about
GCC_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX_SUCK (IIRC) and other zawinskies of this
sort :-)
Well, I like the macros. A few of the mods I've made would have
been a lot harder without them. It's just another form of modularity.
9231
days inactive
9231
days old
3 comments
4 participants
tags (0)
participants (4)
-
Andy Piper -
Didier Verna -
Kyle Jones -
Marcus Thiessel