2:35 p.m.
Fabrice Popineau wrote:
* Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> writes:
> I type M-x vm-visit-folder RET /tmp/aidan/spam RET
> I make a change, press S , and I get the coding system conflict
> message. It says, again, that:
> “All preapproved coding systems (buffer-default==binary
> preferred==utf-16-little-endian-bom) fail to appropriately encode
> some of the characters present in the buffer.”
Has this issue been solved ? I have upgraded my xemacs to the latest
21.5 cvs sources and xemacs-packages and I seem to get a similar
problem. I can't even byte-compile a .el file, because I get this very
same message about the compile log buffer.
Hi Fabrice, hope you're doing well. :-)
When I encountered this problem last week, I could restore the old
behavior with the patch
--- DEL.latin-unity.el 2006-08-14 09:52:34.000000000 +0200
+++ latin-unity.el 2007-02-06 23:25:41.000000000 +0100
＠＠ -484,7 +484,7 ＠＠
;; #### actually we can do the whole charset here
;; precompute and set a property on the cs symbol
(setq skipchars (concat skipchars (list ch)))
- (when (= flag 0) (setq lsets (logior
latin-unity-non-latin-bit-flag lsets)))
+ ;(when (= flag 0) (setq lsets (logior
latin-unity-non-latin-bit-flag lsets)))
(setq lsets (logior flag lsets)))))
;; The characters skipped here can't change asciisets
(skip-chars-forward skipchars))))
Though Stephen will probably tell you that this is the wrong
solution, as it restores another bug. Nevertheless, since I never
encountered the other bug, but have this one regularly, I use this
patch until Stephen comes up with a better solution. Maybe that
works for you as well.
Best,
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod Email: jschrod(a)acm.org
Roedermark, Germany
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
9:37 a.m.
New subject: [latin-unity] Fix suboptimal interaction of latin-unity and VM.
latin-unity
Could you guys try this patch? This should fix it, conceptually. If
it doesn't, there are some other severe problems with the whole
latin-unity approach, I'm afraid. I don't have a comprehensive test
suite, so I can't be sure it will work for you.
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/packages/mule-packages/latin-unity/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -r1.50 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 16 Feb 2007 09:10:18 -0000 1.50
+++ ChangeLog 16 Feb 2007 09:21:32 -0000
＠＠ -0,0 +1,8 ＠＠
+2007-02-16 Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org>
+
+ * latin-unity.el (latin-unity-representations-present-region):
+ Assume C1 characters map to themselves, as is true for all
+ ISO-8859-X coding systems. Should fix the bug reported by
+ Joachim Schrod and Fabrice Popineau. See
+ <ire6dxp3.fsf(a)esemetz.metz.supelec.fr>.
+
Index: latin-unity.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/packages/mule-packages/latin-unity/latin-unity.el,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 latin-unity.el
--- latin-unity.el 16 Feb 2007 09:10:18 -0000 1.16
+++ latin-unity.el 16 Feb 2007 09:21:32 -0000
＠＠ -491,12 +491,27 ＠＠
;;(setq skipchars (concat skipchars latin-unity-latin-jisx0201))
(setq skipchars (concat skipchars (list ch)))
(setq asets (logior flag asets)))
+ ;; Control-1 hack
+ ;; C1 characters map to themselves in all ISO 8859 coding
+ ;; systems. So we ignore them in the feasibility computation.
+ ;; #### It would be nice to unify Windows-12xx charsets among
+ ;; themselves. Then add a local variable c1sets, and treat
+ ;; skipchars as in the default clause, below. This requires
+ ;; deciding how to treat C1 characters when graphic characters
+ ;; are also present in the same range. What Would Gates Do?
+ ;; This will also require an interface change. This function
+ ;; will need to return (lsets c1set asets), which is why I'm
+ ;; not doing the generalization yet.
+ ((eq cs 'control-1)
+ ;; minor optimization
+ (setq skipchars (concat "\200-\237" skipchars)))
(t
;; #### actually we can do the whole charset here
;; precompute and set a property on the cs symbol
(setq skipchars (concat skipchars (list ch)))
- (when (= flag 0) (setq lsets (logior latin-unity-non-latin-bit-flag lsets)))
- (setq lsets (logior flag lsets)))))
+ (if (= flag 0)
+ (setq lsets (logior latin-unity-non-latin-bit-flag lsets))
+ (setq lsets (logior flag lsets))))))
;; The characters skipped here can't change asciisets
(skip-chars-forward skipchars))))
(cons lsets asets)))
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
10:35 a.m.
New subject: [latin-unity] Fix suboptimal interaction of latin-unity and VM.
>>>> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
SJT> latin-unity
SJT> Could you guys try this patch? This should fix it, conceptually.
Great! It fixes my problem in all my testcases.
Thanks for looking at it,
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod Email: jschrod(a)acm.org
Roedermark, Germany
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
11:11 a.m.
New subject: [latin-unity] Fix suboptimal interaction of latin-unity and VM.
* Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
latin-unity Could you guys try this patch? This should fix it,
conceptually. If it doesn't, there are some other severe problems
with the whole latin-unity approach, I'm afraid. I don't have a
comprehensive test suite, so I can't be sure it will work for you.
The situation vastly improved, but I still can't get the attachments to work
under Gnus. I even start to wonder if it is related.
Thanks for this patch. I'll investigate my other issue.
Fabrice
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
1:30 p.m.
New subject: [latin-unity] Fix suboptimal interaction of latin-unity and VM.
Fabrice Popineau writes:
The situation vastly improved, but I still can't get the
attachments to work
under Gnus. I even start to wonder if it is related.
"Attachments under Gnus"? Sorry, I don't remember this (probably my
acute brain cell loss...). Is there a thread you can point me to?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
3:40 p.m.
New subject: [latin-unity] Fix suboptimal interaction of latin-unity and VM.
"Attachments under Gnus"? Sorry, I don't remember this
(probably my
acute brain cell loss...). Is there a thread you can point me to?
Up to now, I could open a pdf sent as an attached file by cliking on it in
the Gnus Article buffer. Now I get a corrupted file. As I upgraded my whole
XEmacs tree (source and xemacs-packages and latest Gnus at once), I assumed
that there were only one problem, namely the latin-unity one. Apparently, I
may have another one.
Fabrice
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
4:16 p.m.
New subject: [latin-unity] Fix suboptimal interaction of latin-unity and VM.
Fabrice Popineau writes:
> "Attachments under Gnus"? Sorry, I don't remember
this (probably my
> acute brain cell loss...). Is there a thread you can point me to?
Up to now, I could open a pdf sent as an attached file by cliking on
it in
the Gnus Article buffer. Now I get a corrupted file. As I upgraded my whole
XEmacs tree (source and xemacs-packages and latest Gnus at once),
"Latest Gnus" == Gnus CVS (not an XEmacs package)?
Have you confirmed that this only happens if latin-unity is installed?
What happens with "xemacs -vanilla -f gnus", and then click on the PDF
attachment?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
6489
days inactive
6491
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Fabrice Popineau -
Fabrice Popineau
-
Joachim Schrod -
Stephen J. Turnbull