10:22 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 5:37 PM, <commits-noreply(a)bitbucket.org> wrote:
2 new commits in auctex:
https://bitbucket.org/xemacs/auctex/commits/57b6e9cb7d88/
Changeset: 57b6e9cb7d88
User: matsl
Date: 2014-06-28 01:12:14
Summary: Sync with upstream 11.84 (merge from branch)
2014-06-28 Mats Lidell <matsl(a)xemacs.org>
* ChangeLog.auctex: Merged upstream Changelog to Changelog.auctex.
* Sync with upstream 11.84 (i.e. merge with branch
auctex-11_84-import.)
Affected #: 260 files
Mats,
This merge erased a lot of ChangeLog entries, and added a lot. Did we
merge an upstream ChangeLog with our package ChangeLog?
Also, some of the CVS keyword expansions disappeared again; e.g., the
$Id$ expansions in preview/preview.el, style/article.el, etc. I think
they mostly don't matter, but the expansion of $Name$ in
preview/preview.el is manipulated by Lisp code.
Also also, the build with texinfo 5.x is broken again:
cd doc && makeinfo -o auctex.info auctex.texi
./macros.texi:10: warning: redefining Texinfo language command: ＠LaTeX
./quickstart.texi:166: warning: ＠iftex should only appear at a line
beginning (possibly involving ＠sans)
./quickstart.texi:166: superfluous argument to ＠end ifnottex:
＠samp{\textsf＠{＠point{}＠}} text. (possibly involving ＠sans)
auctex.texi:416: warning: ＠iftex should only appear at a line
beginning (possibly involving ＠sans)
auctex.texi:416: superfluous argument to ＠end ifnottex:
＠samp{\textsf＠{＠point{}＠}} text. (possibly involving ＠sans)
auctex.texi:2217: warning: ＠tex should only appear at a line beginning
../../XEmacs.rules:316: recipe for target 'doc/auctex.info' failed
Let me know if you'd like some help fixing these issues. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
4:41 a.m.
New subject: commit/auctex: 2 new changesets
Jerry James writes:
This merge erased a lot of ChangeLog entries, and added a lot. Did
we merge an upstream ChangeLog with our package ChangeLog?
No, this work was done on a branch over quite some period of time, and
there is no real point in merging most of the work done in the interim
on the mainline, as the changes were pervasive at all levels.
We might consider making a pseudo-package "auctex7" which just
contains the old tarballs.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
7:12 a.m.
New subject: commit/auctex: 2 new changesets
>>>> Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
This merge erased a lot of ChangeLog entries, and added a lot. Did
we merge an upstream ChangeLog with our package ChangeLog?
I tried not to. I tried to merge the upstream ChangeLog to
ChangeLog.auctex. But maybe the merge played did something I ought to
have observed. I'll have a look at this.
Also, some of the CVS keyword expansions disappeared again; e.g.,
the
$Id$ expansions in preview/preview.el, style/article.el, etc. I think
they mostly don't matter, but the expansion of $Name$ in
preview/preview.el is manipulated by Lisp code.
Yes. I inserted the expansions I though was needed verbatim in a few
files to get the preview.dvi to build.
I'm confused here though. From looking in the auctex upstream git repo
I see no CVS keywords at all in most files. I wonder where we got them
from in our branch (or have the auctex team re-released 11.84 with the
CVS keywords removed?)
It seems like the auctex upstream have done away with the CVS keywords
except for a few. Since we base our packages on upstream releases it
might be OK to just to keep the expanded keywords as released by
upstream?
Also also, the build with texinfo 5.x is broken again:
Hmm... I guess I'm building with an old version still. I was afraid
though this could happen. The 11.84-branch was a bit old so it would
likely contain bad things. Sorry but I thought it would be easier to
fix this from the checked in version than in the branch.
Let me know if you'd like some help fixing these issues.
Please help with the texinfo stuff either by doing it or give me a
pointer what needs to be adjusted. I don't know much about texinfo I'm
afraid. I was happy to figure out how to get the preview.dvi to build
at all.
For the other issues - see the comments above - and we'll take it from
there.
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
11:36 a.m.
New subject: commit/auctex: 2 new changesets
Please help with the texinfo stuff either by doing it or give me a
pointer what needs to be adjusted. I don't know much about texinfo I'm
afraid. I was happy to figure out how to get the preview.dvi to build
at all.
For the other issues - see the comments above - and we'll take it
from
there.
Thanks all of you, till 11th of July I am too busy to participate in any
activities concerning auctex, sorry.
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
3796
days inactive
3798
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Jerry James -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
The XEmacs Package Smoketest -
Uwe Brauer