<3.0.3.32.19980424101946.00a9d620(a)exchange.parallax.co.uk>
At 02:37 PM 4/27/98 +0200, you wrote:
>Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
>
>> + dnl check for our special version of select
>> AC_TRY_RUN([#include <fcntl.h>
>> int main() { return (open("/dev/windows", O_RDONLY, 0) > 0)? 0
:
1; }],
>> [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_MSG_SELECT)])
>> const_is_losing=no
>> with_file_coding=yes
>> + use_minimal_tagbits=yes
>> + use_indexed_lrecord_implementation=yes
>
>Why is this here? I believe it is wrong to unconditionally define
>minimal tagbits and indexed lrecord implementation.
Temporary fix until we can come up with another (better solution).
Defining
DATA_SEG_BITS does not apparently cut it.
andy