>>>> "Valdis" == Valdis Kletnieks
<Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu> writes:
Valdis> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:09:04 +0100, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] said:
> Sure there is a fix level, but there's no single *PTF* which
cures the
> problem. There's one announced in the APAR, but that doesn't seem to
> exist as of two hours ago.
Valdis> Odd.. which one was that, exactly?
U468747, supposedly.
> Anyways, it's not that declaring getaddrinfo broken incurs a
loss in
> functionality, so I'll just submit an s&m patch.
Valdis> OK.. I'll admit I've had 4 hours sleep and only one can of caffienated
Valdis> beverage so far, so my neurons are misfiring a tad..
Valdis> But if disabling getaddrinfo incurs no loss of functionality, why are
Valdis> we checking for it in the first place?
Transition to the relevant POSIX / Unix98 API which is supposed to
supersede the old BSD interface.
--
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla