Re: Proposed version number change for 21.2

Saturday, 10 October 1998


        Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:

...
 SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes:
> There wouldn't be a 21.2.  That's part of the point.  There would be
> a 21.2.XX where XX is the number where we finally release. 
...
 But then we introduce a .XX which is totally redundant from the
users' 
 point of view. 
I'm very frustrated with how things are being numbered.  As a matter
of fact, I think the release currently being planned on being numbered 
21.1 (a bug fix release for the elusive 21.0) would be better numbered 
21.0.XX where XX is greater than the beta number we finally release at.

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998