sb> sb> Greg Klanderman <greg(a)alphatech.com&gt; writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: sb> sb> That's fine with me. Do you wish this to happen immediately? That would be ideal. Can you see my post about the format to xemacs-patches - there are 2 options, one which requires changing package-info.in for all packages but is a little cleaner. Let me know which you prefer as soon as you can. sb> I'm going to release 21.2-beta3 this afternoon/evening along with a sb> handful of package updates for a full dose of new package UI testing. Will you commit my package-get-base patches too? The package UI stuff is broken otherwise. Also Jan's "big screwup in package-ui" one. If so I am close to another patch that should go in, depending on your choice above. sb> Why don't you fix up the latest package-index on ftp.xemacs.org, drop sb> the modified copy in: sb> ftp://altair.xemacs.org/incoming/ But it wouldn't contain the updates you're about to make, or is that just so you don't have to rebuild all packages? If you want I can run a keyboard macro across the new one you create later, I've done it here. But I'd prefer it get created automatically with the build process so that part also gets tested.