Why don't you use a more standard API? LDAP is basically a database, so why
don't
you model the API after the other database interfaces in XEmacs?
ben
Oscar Figueiredo wrote:
LDAP calls should now be more robust with regard to interruptions.
New
functions for adding and deleting records from an LDAP server. Record
modification is on its way.
Oscar
1999-11-14 Oscar Figueiredo <Oscar.Figueiredo(a)di.epfl.ch>
* eldap.h(Fldap_add_internal, Fldap_delete_internal): New
functions
* eldap.c (Fldap_add_internal, Fldap_delete_internal): New
functions
(Fldap_open): Set the `LDAP_OPT_RESTART' option to avoid LDAP
calls being interrupted by XEmacs signals
(Fldap_search_internal): Remove useless calls to
`slow_down_interrupts' and `speed_up_interrupts'
1999-11-14 Oscar Figueiredo <Oscar.Figueiredo(a)di.epfl.ch>
* ldap.el (toplevel): Signal error when XEmacs has been compiled
without LDAP
(ldap-add, ldap-delete): New defuns