Rebecca Ore <rebecca.ore(a)op.net> writes:
Right would be to have a .xemacs file,
That would be definitely wrong, if we ever plan to introduce a
`.xemacs/' directory. Confusing `.emacs' and `.xemacs/init.el' and
the various options is bad enough; if we add `.xemacs' as a *file*
into the picture, it's going to get *really* bad.
perhaps, or is there some reason to stay current with .emacs.
See above...
I can see someone with a carefully customized Gnus Emacs .emacs file
being really unhappy if XEmacs rewrites that file without warning.
Good point. My mind is not set on that one.
As I'm currently being e-grenaded or sniped (bomb is too dramatic
a
word, but it's like one a minute) by someone who doesn't like
protests to isps of email spam, I might be a bit distracted tonight.
Good luck!
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Silence!" cries Freydag. "I did not call thee in for a consultation!"
"They are my innards! I will not have them misread by a poseur!"