At 12:14 06/11/98 +0100, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote:
Yeah, why don't you keep me involved in this discussion
infinitely.
This way, I'll never get around to looking at it. This is seriously
starting to annoy me.
C'mon Michael. There is a patch, with a ChangeLog and explanation that I
have seen many times before. If you don't apply it, people will apply it
anyway and you will still get FAQ's. If you don't apply it we (you
especially) will get far more FAQ's from people wondering why efs doesn't
work. I really don't see what the big deal is. This has been simmering for
*months*, is it really that hard to expedite this one patch?
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web:
www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp