Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch&gt; writes: > Hmmm.. Somebody is just contributing a whole new DLL support module to > XEmacs. It would be a pity that if for once there is effort going on to > keep the two more or less in line the XEmacs side would screw it up. > > IMHO this a major reason to stay with the old method for XEmacs or > alternatively that the new implementation be sent to RMS for inclusion > in stead. I disagree with this reasoning. With all due respect to Bill's worthy contribution of cross-platform low-level DLL code, the new elisp-level code looked better and more polished than anything we had before. Perhaps J. Kean Johnston would be prepared to argue with Stallman over this, but given his bad experiences a few messages before, I doubt it.