>>>> "Ben" == Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com>
writes:
Ben> "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> >>>>> "mb" == Martin Buchholz
<martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
mb> Do we have to subclass the Athena widgets?
> It's that or rewrite our event loop to be compatible with a
> modern widget set such as GTK, isn't it?
Ben> Explain?
??
Don't we want all the modern interface elements like tabs and real
pushbuttons in C and progress bars and sliders and so on? I don't
much care for myself, but a lot of people seem to think that's
important to XEmacs TNG (you among them, I thought). I agree that
probably would broaden XEmacs's appeal.
But we've had the GTK discussion in the last year or so, and basically
gtk insists on a non-Xt-compatible event loop. ThusHaveIBeenInformed.
OTOH, using Athena as the base for those things means subclassing.
And everybody seems to detest working with the Lucid widgets, although
they were good for their time. That leaves us with the choice I
posed.
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."