Mark Borges <mdb(a)cdc.noaa.gov> writes:
Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 10:00:36PM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
>> > libtiff support isn't there yet -- the most recent
>> > libraries are ignored.
>>
>> Is that considered a bug or a feature ?
It's a feature the way things are coded now. I consider it a bug.
>> Hrvoje Niksic(Hrvoje) wrote:
Hrvoje> A bug. Our
code appears to expect (and only works with) an older
Hrvoje> version of libtiff.
What is the most recent libtiff again? I thought we had a fairly
recent version,
It's a beta, as a matter of fact ...
That's it.
from Leffler's site. Anyway, XEmacs auto-detects this version,
It should not. That library is binary incompatible with what XEmacs
expects.
/* $Header: /d1/sam/tiff/libtiff/RCS/tiff.h,v 1.78 1997/08/29
21:45:38 sam Exp $ */
You're looking at the wrong file. Look at tiffio.h. The version
XEmacs can use looks like:
/*
* This define can be used in code that requires
* compilation-related definitions specific to a
* version or versions of the library. Runtime
* version checking should be done based on the
* string returned by TIFFGetVersion.
*/
#define TIFFLIB_VERSION 19960307 /* March 7, 1996 */
The newer version Hrvoje has is:
/*
* This define can be used in code that requires
* compilation-related definitions specific to a
* version or versions of the library. Runtime
* version checking should be done based on the
* string returned by TIFFGetVersion.
*/
#define TIFFLIB_VERSION 19970127 /* January 27, 1997 */