Re: Xft performance with XEmacs 21.5.28 on Mac OS 10.5
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
William Gallafent <william(a)gallaf.net> writes:
Does anyone know of an Xft speed test application that I could use to
see
which operations are slow? (Or just another Xft-intensive applicatiion which
I could install (ideally from macports!) ...)
On another note, I have now observed that there are a number of X Errors being
reported in the console from which XEmacs is being run.
X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
Major opcode of failed request: 66 (X_PolySegment)
Serial number of failed request: 78700
Current serial number in output stream: 78709
I first tried XFT xemacs after installing leopard and found it
very appealing, but with an unusably slow redraw (think 2400 baud :-).
Also saw tons of BadMatch on X_PolySegment as above.
After upgrading X using the developer (unofficial) build from
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/xquartz/wiki/Releases
and rebuilding XEmacs it all works great. On perception alone, it
seems just as fast to me as non-XFT XEmacs, altho cpu usage maybe
a bit higher when typing.
--
--tony
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
William Gallafent
Thursday, 20 December
Thu, 20 Dec
12:22 p.m.
New subject: Xft performance with XEmacs 21.5.28 on Mac OS 10.5
On 10 Dec 2007, at 01:11, Tony Bennett wrote:
I first tried XFT xemacs after installing leopard and found it
very appealing, but with an unusably slow redraw (think 2400 baud :-).
Yes, that sounds familiar!
Also saw tons of BadMatch on X_PolySegment as above.
After upgrading X using the developer (unofficial) build from
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/xquartz/wiki/Releases
and rebuilding XEmacs it all works great. On perception alone, it
seems just as fast to me as non-XFT XEmacs, altho cpu usage maybe
a bit higher when typing.
Excellent news. I therefore plan to install one of these releases in
due course and try XEmacs again. Thanks for the infomation :)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
6182
days inactive
6192
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Tony Bennett -
William Gallafent