Re: Mercurial "r####" numbers are not stable, use commit ids

ST> It may be *possible* to do what I want to do in Mercurial, but it's ST> clearly not a preferred (or even documented) work flow. You're probably right, but have you asked on the Mercurial user list? There are probably more people there who use named branches, and they might be able to give some workflow tips. Come to think of it, I remember seeing someone advertising a pbranch extension[1] that sounded like it might be closer to your preferred workflow. And the extensions page mentions a localbranch extension[2] that might also be relevant. cheers, mike Footnotes: [1] http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/PatchBranchExtension [2] http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/LocalbranchExtension _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta