Re: GC leak?

SJT> The claim is also made that "in well-written code" only one line in SJT> 10000 should refer to finalization. Is that true of XEmacs? Yeah, pretty much: I was able to nuke many finalizers by transforming separately allocated data structures to Lisp objects. Some of the remaining finalizers are also likely to go away, as soon as I (or someone else) find the time to lift the remaining, separately allocated objects to Lisp objects. Then, the garbage collector takes care of all resources; finalizers that only free additional memory are no longer needed. -- Marcus _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta