David Kastrup writes:
Poor excuse. If there is no obvious way to get from the greyed-out
menu entry to an installed package providing it, it just serves to
annoy the user.
There is an obvious way: ask on XEmacs-Beta. :-)
For people wanting to discover everything, there is Sumo. People
not installing it presumably _want_ a customized XEmacs.
In practice, that usually turns out not to be the case. They *think*
they want a customized (usually spelled s-l-i-m) XEmacs, then discover
they want the kitchen sink after all.
If a less than Sumo XEmacs is strictly inferior not just in
functionality but also usability and simplicity than Sumo, the
package system provides _only_ disadvantages to the user when
compared to a monolithic system like Emacs.
Not at all.
1. "make beta; make check" is *way* faster than just "make
bootstrap".
("What's good for the developers trickles down to the users.")
2. New packages can be officially released without a SUMO release, and
without an XEmacs release.
3. Upgraded packages can be made available much faster than XEmacs
releases.
4. Experimental versions of *some* packages can be installed, and will
upgrade smoothly when officially released.
5. APIs used by packages tend to drift rather than fault. (This has
its ups and downs, but IMO the users get a better experience.)
6. It keeps Tom Tromey busy. Ie, packages seem to be pretty popular at
Emacs Central, too,
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta