Re: Outstanding hot issues. Was[ Re: is `-name' functional?]
Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> The problem was created by some *introducing* the `.xemacs/' dir
> prematurely.
Somethimes trying whether it works is a good option IMHO.
You misunderstand. What I hinted at were Karl Hegbloom's patches that
moved various startup files to .xemacs/FOO without even *checking* if
I have a `.xemacs/' directory (I don't.)
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"],(unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);}