On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 01:22 +0200, Mats Lidell wrote:
Thanks for the support. I think you volunteered at a time when I was
considering doing the same. Maybe I even did some testing of initial
ebuilds and provided some support for the sumo-build. Memory seems to
come back here...
I'm still using your scripts to semi-automatically sync our
packages.:-)
Luckily you beat me to it. I dont know if I ever would have managed
to
qualify. If I remember correctly it was then a rather ambitious
program you had to go through to qualify as a maintainer. I guess it
is still that way!?
Yes, the procedure is still the same. You need a mentor (I can do that)
and you need to take two quizzes about how Gentoo works and how our
ebuilds work. Most information is around, so with a decent search engine
and prior knowledge of programming and scripts, you'd be done in a day
or two. The behind-the-scenes view of the process is outlined here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/recruiters/
So although tempted again to step up I guess that my limited time
will
do more good within the XEmacs project than to spend time with
maintaining XEmacs for Gentoo. How much work would you say a minimal
maintainance effort would take? How much time does it take to qualify
as a Gentoo maintainance?
Right now maintenance for XEmacs takes no time at all, since there have
not been recent releases :-( A new round of packages usually takes a
couple of hours to handle, a new release of XEmacs itself about the
same. It probably takes longer the first time :-)
Then there is the occasional bug that needs to be dealt with. You can
get more ambitious by taking on more projects, like preparing the tree
for sxemacs or adding xemacs support to more packages that provide their
own el files. Our list of open bugs is
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=xemacs&list_id=1173980
Kind regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta