Naming convention in emacsbug.el

What is this doing on -review? It's about code, is it not? SY> I was just wondering, is there any reason why emacsbug.el uses SY> function and variable names in the format *-emacs-*? Yes. Except for the addresses, everything in that file should work on both variants. SY> Would it be so politically incorrect for the XEmacs bug SY> reporting code to use *-xemacs-* instead? And can the file SY> itself be renamed to 'xemacsbug.el'? Why do this? defaliasing `report-xemacs-bug' to invoke `report-emacs-bug' is a good idea. The rest of it is gratuitous. Remember, _we_ do 90% or more of the work of synching. Why make it harder for ourselves? If you've already done it (I would assume so), it's up to you do decide if the above is convincing enough to reverse it. I don't have that strong an opinion, and after all, you'll be doing any extra work entailed. :-) -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."