Re: [Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>] Re: Status of pcl-cvs development?

Hannu> Hannu> greg(a)alphatech.com (Greg Klanderman) writes: Hannu> | I too prefer pcl-cvs. Hannu> Hannu> This is what I thought would be the case for most CVS+Emacs Hannu> users. Thanks for the comments, you and Russ. I have been toying Hannu> with an idea to make a sort of a VC-replacement-layer for Hannu> pcl-cvs so that you could use the same functionality from "two Hannu> views", that is, via VC-based interface from buffers with the Hannu> current buffer/file being the default target of operation and Hannu> from pcl-cvs' traditional UI. I'll see if I can get anything Hannu> usable out of this idea. I imagine you should be able to use both pcl-cvs and either cvs.el or vc.el simultaneously as things are now. There's also a pcl-cvs-buffer.el included with 2.0b2 which gives buffer based cvs operation, though the timestamp indicates it has not been touched in nearly 6 years and I have never tried it. Hannu> | I'm currently synching our (XEmacs) version Hannu> | with Greg Woods' pcl-cvs 2.0b2 and adding several features. This will Hannu> Hannu> I hope your additions are usable also with Emacs. Yup, except for the font stuff in pcl-cvs-xemacs.el. Hannu> | Eventually I hope to get it working on NT too, though I do not Hannu> | actually use NT so I'll need some help there. Hannu> Hannu> I may be able to do testing at least. Assuming that I re-install Hannu> NT -- I swore I never touch NT again, but I guess I have to, if Hannu> not for other reasons, then simply to be able to maintain and Hannu> test my emacs configuration's NT support which some people Hannu> depend on :) Hannu> Hannu> //Hannu