"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
What I'd rather have, if you would, is advice on integrating
SpamBayes
into the Mailman pipeline. Recently some of the newer spams are
getting past both SpamAssassin (SpA in the diagram below) and my own
procmail filters, and updating them is a very painstaking and
unreliable process. I'd like to replace them with something more
automated. Currently our process looks like this:
--> MTA --> procmail --> Mailman -->
| ^
v |
SpA
I have used in one site a setup with SpamAssassin called from mailman
(a plugin can be found, google("mailman spamassassin")). This makes it
possible to modify the score, if the sender is in the list.
Additionally I have used common bayesian in the SpamAssassin for all
the lists.
I have been quite satisfied with the setup.
--
Ilpo Nyyssönen # biny # /* :-) */
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta