Re: Perl embedding: trial balloon
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
That said, it's probably possible to use Perl as a scripting
language
as long as Emchars and bufbytes are carefully kept opaque to the Perl
interpreter. Which will, of course drive Perl programmers up the
Wall. And further increase opposition to Mule, I suspect.
Just out of curiosity (as I don't follow the newsgroups that much),
how many people are opposed to Mule? I had the impression it was
pretty well established, having been adopted by both FSF and XEmacs.
Of course, I don't use it much, being an American.
If it's just good old Erik with his cl-emacs, I can almost guarantee
you that man will never ally himself with a Perl programmer.