Re: Patch queue status

* "APA" == Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: SY> * "APA" == Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: APA> What packaging route should we take regarding APA> ps-print-nomule APA> vs. APA> ps-print-mule APA> vs. APA> ps-print SY> How about... SY> - rename the package ps-print-nomule to ps-print SY> - ps-print.el is turned into a wrapper kind of thing: SY> (if (featurep 'mule) SY> (require 'ps-print-mule) SY> (require 'ps-print-nomule)) SY> - ps-print-mule.el becomes the Mule equiv of the old SY> ps-print.el SY> - ps-print-nomule.el becomes the non-Mule equiv of old SY> ps-print.el SY> Just a thought, what do you think? APA> I have merged our ps-print.el with APA> http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-patches/199912/msg00158.html APA> and am in the process of testing. Great. APA> My view: APA> Ideally we should have one ps-print package with APA> ps-bdf.el APA> ps-mule.el APA> ps-print.el APA> in it. I think this is a good approach. APA> How we make use of ps-bdf.el and ps-mule.el remains to be discussed. APA> My upcoming patch will deliver a merged ps-print.el somewhat more APA> up-to-date than emac-20.7 ps-print, BUT with MULE functionality APA> commented out. It's a step in the right direction, IMO. -- |---<Regards, Steve Youngs>-----------[GnuPG KeyID: 59E4C4B2]---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor... | | It's a way of life. | |----------------------------------<mailto:youngs＠xemacs.org>---|