On Monday, February 18, 2008 at 08:03:04, Stephen Turnbull, XEmacs 21 4 Release Manager
wrote:
[...]
Robert, I assume that you want to keep the VM version number in sync
with its XEmacs package version, as Kyle did. However, XEmacs package
versions are not compatible with double-dot versions, AFAIK. Please
consult with Norbert and maybe Steve Y and Ville about that.
Hi Norbert,
how should I assign the version number of the package so it
matches to the upstream version ... I so not see any rules
for the other packages and was thinking about
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
to transform by
"%d.%2d%d", MAJOR, MINOR, PATCH
e.g. for 8.0.8 the package version 8.008, for 8.1.2 the
package version 8.012 or are there any rules or limitation
for the package numbers?
Cheers Robert
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta