Re: fatal error handling
Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes:
+ and DISABLES AUTO-SAVING ENTIRELY during crashes! Way way bad
idea.
+
+ Instead let's just be more intelligent about avoiding crashing
+ when possible, esp. nested crashes.
I think I like the new code for the assert() case. Especially given
the fact you preserve the message if we crash in assert.
I still think that for SIG_SEGV we really shouldn't be doing anything
apart from printing the backtrace.
Jan