|--==> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
>>>>>"mb" == Martin Buchholz
<martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
mb> To keep things sane, it makes sense to
have an unstable branch
mb> of the packages. Developers could check out the unstable
mb> branch using
SJT> I think this would make things _in_sane. Individual packages can have
SJT> their own unstable branches, but this should be under control of the
SJT> package maintainer.
SJT> Furthermore, in Ovidiu's case, he would have to _depend_ on the
SJT> _unstable_ branch of JDE. Yuck! How the hell do we sort _that_ out
SJT> in the SUMOs?
I don't even wanna think about that one.
SJT> I agree that committer education will be hard, because we're going to
SJT> have to teach them to Do The Right Thing without knowing what it is
SJT> ourselves. Let's not go there.
Agreed, wholeheartedly.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|