Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> writes:
* Michael Sperber <sperber(a)deinprogramm.de>:
> Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>
> > I'm too stupid. I'm able to do the diff between the two revisions, but
> > how to merge?
> >
> > Here's the log output:
> >
> > changeset: 1005:0c5a1e2bb50f
> > tag: tip
> > parent: 1003:b870d5948d75
> > parent: 1004:e361c37e5f87
> > user: Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org>
> > date: Thu Sep 05 09:19:14 2013 +0200
> > summary: pending operations
> >
> > changeset: 1004:e361c37e5f87
> > parent: 1000:9b7a21e38bc7
> > user: Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com>
> > date: Thu Aug 22 15:59:30 2013 -0600
> > summary: Add the functions number-sequence, string-or-null-p, and
> > booleanp to
>
> So these are the only heads? Do something like this:
>
> hg update 1005
> hg merge 1004
>
> or vice versa (i.e. swap 1005/1004). If they're the only two heads, you
> can usually omit the argument to "hg merge".
That doesn't work (direct ancestry).
Ah, my bad, didn't see that.
I can update to 1003 and merge 1004, though:
hg update 1003
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
hg merge 1004
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
Would that do any good?
No, because that's already done by 1005. What does "hg heads" say? It
now looks as though everything that could be merged has been merged.
--
Regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta