Re: c-fill-paragraph not working
-- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)arsdigita.com> spake thusly:
Andy Piper <andyp(a)bea.com> writes:
> At 06:12 PM 4/24/2002 -0700, Matt Tucker wrote:
>> To be automatically buffer-local? I don't know enough about how it
>> works to know whether that's the right thing to do. But if it is,
>> then sure.
>
> Ben or Hrvoje or someone should probably comment, but not being
> buffer-local seems inherently broken to me.
Judging by the docstring, you're right -- it's supposed to be
mode-specific, and in my book that implies buffer-local.
Fair enough. How about the following, then:
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 232 bytes)
- fill.el.patch (application/octet-stream — 424 bytes)