>>>> "SY" == Steve Youngs
<youngs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
SY> No it's not new. You've even commented on it before and if I
SY> use the same configure options as yourself, I don't see it
SY> either. I just haven't been able to find the time to track
SY> down the offending option yet.
Ah, I remember now. OK, I'll start working on it.
... I've reproduced, and my first guess (--kkcc) ... is it.
This is Mike's stuff. Mike, the following weak list tests in
tests/automated/symbol-tests.el fail with KKCC but pass without KKCC.
Testing /playpen/Projects/XEmacs/21.5/tests/automated/symbol-tests.el...
FAIL: Assertion failed: (eq (length (weak-list-list weak-list)) (if (not reversep) 0
len))
FAIL: Assertion failed: (eq (length (weak-list-list weak-list)) (if (not reversep) 0
len))
symbol-tests.el: 244 of 246 tests successful (99%).
These are both from the first call to `check-weak-list-unique', once
uncompiled, and once compiled.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences
http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.