Re: supporting GTK 3.0 only?
Ar an triochadú lá de mí Deireadh Fómhair, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
Mats Lidell writes:
> >>>>> Michael Sperber <sperber(a)deinprogramm.de> writes:
>
> > I'd feel just fine about that.
>
> +1
I don't have a problem with it.
Jeff, I agree, I think it’s reasonable for you to drop GTK3 support now.
[...] It is possible that we could use something lower-level (such
as
pango, which Jeff has mentioned before and Aidan prefers, I think).
This mis-characterises my opinion. I thought it would have been constructive
to move to Pango in what is currently the XFT code, for the sake of decent
bidi and font coverage support. Given that we have essentially no
development resources for the XFT port, I now think we should move to GTK
instead.
--
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta