Nix writes:
Nothing remotely as good :(
Far be it from me to actually *code* something to help the
competition[1], but "somebody" could start ELPA-izing useful XEmacs
functionality. If so, I *would* be willing to do the admin work to
provide an XEmacs ELPA.
Footnotes:
[1] I did that twice, and in both cases was snubbed, ignored, and
given zero cooperation[2], and generally upset by the experience.
[2] The RMS concept of "cooperation" has been explicitly defined as
"When Emacs gets 100% of what I want, we can work together."
First-time-I-was-a-fool-third-time-lucky-NOT!-ly y'rs,
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta