Re: almost there: lots of process updates, a few other things
Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> writes:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 06:04:26AM -0700, Ben Wing wrote:
> --- process-unix.c 2000/03/01 18:22:05 1.11.2.18
> +++ process-unix.c 2000/03/20 12:16:13
> ＠＠ -72,6 +72,9 ＠＠
> int connected_via_filedesc_p;
> /* Descriptor by which we read from this process. -1 for dead process */
> int infd;
> + /* Descriptor by which we read stderr from this process. -1 for
> + dead process */
> + int errfd;
I know it's a detail, but I hope you meant "Descriptor by which we
write to stderr from this process.". Right?
Aren't we supposed to *read* from the process's stderr, as the comment
says? I thought that was the whole point of the stdout/stderr
distinction.