Re: Why no __attribute__ ((unused)) for g++?
Jerry James writes:
We could try removing the "&&
!defined(__cplusplus)" part and see
if anybody complains.
Will do.
checked version 8. If __INTEL_COMPILER is defined, then the check
should be __INTEL_COMPILER >= 800 or >= 900, depending. Does anybody
have a version 8 installed?
I'll try >= 800 on the same principle as above.
Thanks to the enlightment!
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta