Re: is `-name' functional?
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
* `-name foo' has nothing to do with application class. The two
are
quite orthogonal, only in some (rare) circumstances they overlap.
OK. Now that we're supposed to clean things up, let's arise some
questions again:
- What's the status of the .xemacs directory for 21.0 ? I'd be sad if it's not
gonna make it.
- Sorry but I still think that this mess about the application class is *evil*
*Evil* *EVIL* __EVIL__. We can't possibly be the only app in the whole
universe to decide dynamically on the Xt class, and pretend we're
right. There're already so many things confusing people about X
resources. Let's not add one more.
- Sorry again ;-) but I still think that the modeline shouldn't have the same
default as the default face, and shouldn't be affected by the -bg
option. Although not implemented exactly this way, the modeline *is* a
widget and should look like the menubar, the scrollbars and the dividers by
default.
Enough ranting for the day.
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / E.N.S.T. INF C214 mailto:vernaļ¼ inf.enst.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. (33) 01 45 81 80 72
75634 Paris cedex 13 Fax. (33) 01 45 81 31 19