>>>> " " == Ralf Angeli
<angeli(a)caeruleus.net> writes:
Hello
* David Kastrup (2007-01-27) writes:
> Cc to auctex-devel.
Since the version distributed with the XEmacs package collection
is unsupported upstream, one could conclude that the XEmacs
project is taking care of support for that version. In that
case you should at least add a disclaimer of the different
support address and change the bug reporting address.
Concerning the recent discussion on the auctex and the XEmacs-beta
list with respect to the outdated XEmacs Auctex package I see the
following possibilities.
- I try again to synchronise (upgrade) but this time
successfully. Everybody will be happy (relived whatever) I
presume.
- However since this seems not that simple (at least not for me
nor for Stephen) I could try to upgrade but with preview-latex
disabled. I am not sure that it would me much easier but it
might and since 11.52 does not include preview-latex neither
such a version would present at least some improvement. Would
such a synchronisation be all right with the auctex team?
- I fail again, but we change all the relevant bug address etc,
such that the auctex team will not be bothered by bug reports
of outdated packages. Would that be be all right with the
auctex team?
- Auctex could be removed, but frankly even having an outdated
auctex package *preinstalled* is a value in itself and I would
therefore vote strongly against a deletion.
Any opinions.
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta