Re: Which package would be suitable for password.el?
Simon Josefsson <jas(a)extundo.com> writes:
Steve Youngs <sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> writes:
> > So it overrides XEmacs core elisp code, even though the core code is
> > buggy (see other discussion regarding run-at-time).
>
> No it doesn't. It by-passes buggy package code. The XEmacs
> `run-at-time' exists in the fsf-compat package.
Out of curiosity: Why not fix the code in fsf-compat? Wouldn't that
eliminate the code duplication and be the right thing to do?
Gerd