Re: XEmacs package of unreleased Gnus 5.10.7
>>>> "SY" == Steve Youngs
<steve(a)sxemacs.org> writes:
> I think with Gnus it would make sense to have a "gnus"
package
> and an "ognus" ("ngnus", "mgnus", ...) package.
SY> Oh, scary shit.
Hey, the guy who's package maintainer for the MUA that's more complex
than any OS that actually works shouldn't be scared of a little admin
code, should he? ;-)
SY> Theoretically possible of course, but IMO
SY> development/beta/alpha packages shouldn't be distributed by
SY> XEmacs.org. That's the role of upstream.
That logic leads to reverting to 5.10.6 until 5.10.7 is officially
released. Give me back my fishnet stockings, and the pink lipstick
with sparkles, too!
SY> Fusistance is retile. Your arse will be laminated.
Your current .sig is even more than usually apprpriate in this
context!
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.