Re: Whereto next?
Steve Youngs writes:
We (SXEmacs) look at feature xyz from (X)Emacs, and we either adapt
it
for our own use if it's good, or move on if it's crap.
So, what's are some of SXEmacs's criteria for good vs. crap?
It would be a good idea to find some things where we disagree, or even
where we agree that it's useful, but disagree on priority ... you work
on SXEmacs stuff, we work on XEmacs stuff, later we synch (or not) as
appropriate.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta