Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] AUCTeX 11.84 released
ht(a)inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
> Henry S. Thompson writes:
>
> > Communications failure somewhere?
>
> No. We have communicated about this issue ad nauseum, and it comes
> down to a conflict over quality control systems.
My bad, sorry not to have checked the archives (I did look, but not
hard enough, obviously). Might be worth a _very_ brief note on the
xemacs list in reply to the OP acking their contribution and
summarizing the above, to forestall other readers there jumping to
the same conclusion I did.
Feel free to suggest changes to the text that I have added above the
AUCTeX release announcement if you feel that it is in any manner
misleading, incorrect or irrelevant. I was of the opinion that it
properly presented the current state of affairs as far as it is
relevant to AUCTeX/XEmacs users without being inflammatory. Yes, it
did lead to the "Dead Parrot Sketch" again, but I don't see how I
could have prevented this while retaining the information relevant to
people wanting to use AUCTeX under XEmacs.
Proposals for a better wording are welcome. It does not appear that
the necessity for conveying this information will go away anytime
soon.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta