"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Michael Sperber writes:
> > Is there any reason why the 21.5 sources have to be completely up to
> > date?
>
> No. But I don't know why that would be relevant.
Frequency of conflicts when xemacsweb's 21.5 and package sources get
updated is what I had in mind.
Why would there be a conflict? For a conflict, he'd need to edit the
XEmacs sources and package sources *within* xemacsweb in a conflicting
way.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta