Re: is `-name' functional?
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
>>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic
<hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
Hrvoje> SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
>>
>> > I would expect `xemacs -name fubar' to start a resourceless
>> XEmacs
Think about what a "resourceless" XEmacs would be.
Uh, I meant "XEmacs without my personal resource settings" rather than
"XEmacs with lack of imagination" or anything like that. :-) Sorry
for the confusion.
If you want the equivalent of --vanilla for X resources, there are
two
approaches I can see. One is the xrdb </dev/null approach.
Yeah, that would work, but it hoses all my other resources, so I don't
like it. I wanted an XEmacs-specific solution, like `xemacs -no-resources'.
Hrvoje> I don't know if it ever worked. The funny thing
is that I
Hrvoje> don't even know if it's *supposed* to work. It doesn't
Hrvoje> work in FSFmacs, for instance. It works for xterm,
Hrvoje> though. `xterm -name foo' effectively makes xterm ignore
Hrvoje> all of my resources.
Presumably all your resources are specified with "xterm*...", not
"XTerm*..."?
Yup. Should I rename my resources to `xemacs*'?
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Unspeakable horrors from outer space paralyze the living and
resurrect the dead!