2007/2/22, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
The GFDL is problematic for us (we can't combine our existing
material
with GFDL'd documentation). We may or may not want to ship it as part
of XEmacs proper. It may be preferable to put it in a package.
The files are OpenDocument Presentation files and equivalent PDFs.
So, it is unlikely you'll want to copy content between the
presentation and the rest of xemacs. Given this, is the license OK?
Or, if you prefer, I can contact the author and ask him to
dual-license the files under different terms as well. I doubt he'd
refuse.
What do you think?
--Jason
--
Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile.
I also provide training and spyware removal services for homes and businesses.
Call or email for a FREE 5-minute consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed.
+1 (416) 781-5938 / Email: info(a)jspiro.com / MSN: jasonspiro(a)hotmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta