Re: [ANNOUNCE] Unofficial XEmacs Packages

|--==> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: SJT> Steve: is there some way that people with commit privileges can be SJT> allowed to create packages in CVS without interfering with your work? SJT> I'm thinking about something like adding a SJT> .../alpha-packages/$developer-name/$package-name hierarchy parallel to SJT> the "official" .../packages/xemacs-packages hierarchy. Sure. I'll create directory under XEmacs/packages/ called "unsupported". With a README containing the appropriate warnings and disclaimers. I'd rather call it "unsupported" than "alpha-packages" to reduce confusion. SJT> I'm just guessing, but probably we can just drop the standard SJT> makefiles and XEmacs.rules (maybe with STAGING defaulting to somewhere SJT> other than the usual "official packages" STAGING) in there. More than likely. My only requirements are what I mentioned in another post to this thread. Namely: - They install to /site-packages/ - They don't have a _pkg.el file. - They don't have a package-index file. Those last two points will change, but PUI needs enhancing first. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|