Andy Piper <andyp(a)bea.com> writes:
At 06:12 PM 4/24/2002 -0700, Matt Tucker wrote:
>To be automatically buffer-local? I don't know enough about how it
>works to know whether that's the right thing to do. But if it is, then
>sure.
Ben or Hrvoje or someone should probably comment, but not being
buffer-local seems inherently broken to me.
Judging by the docstring, you're right -- it's supposed to be
mode-specific, and in my book that implies buffer-local.