Re: xemacs & redhat

MB> We could unilaterally change all our names to MB> be prefixed with `x', but.... MB> xctags MB> xetags MB> xgnudoit MB> xgnuserv MB> ... MB> but that would only increase the confusion about xemacs being an MB> X11-only app, besides being amazingly ugly. And break all the user's scripts. MB> I'm open to realistic suggestions on how we actually implement this. As far as gnuserv is concerned, this can be unbundled and xemacs can rely on the gnuserv.rpm in RedHat's contrib. What exactly is the problem with ctags? Is it bundled with emacs.rpm? If so, I can see two solutions: 1. The etags and ctags things can be installed in a different directory than the one used by emacs.rpm 2. Better yet, e/ctags might be better off as a separate package, and redhat might agree to unbundle them from emacs.rpm --michael