Re: [AC] [PACKAGES (unsupported)] Fix unsupported build env

Ville> BTW, I have no intention to send unsupported stuff to Ville> xemacs-patches in the future, but did so in this case Ville> because the unsupported area has just been kicked off, the Ville> patch affected other people's (Steve, Simon) stuff too, and Ville> I wasn't 100% sure about it. I agree with your reasoning here, Steve's statement was rather general. I think the infrastructure parts of unsupported (the Makefile, XEmacs.rules, etc), _should_ be done publically, but for the moment xemacs-design is probably the best place. I'll cons up a mailing list later this week. Is xemacs-unsupported OK for the name? Or maybe xemacs-contrib? Suggestions welcome. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py